Structural Analysis and Design to Eurocodes

The multifunctional research and sports center in Kaunas is an example of the integrated use of LIRA-FEM and LIRA-CAD for structural analysis and building design in accordance with Eurocode requirements. The project included modelling of load-bearing structures, load definition, linear and nonlinear analyses for ULS and SLS, as well as analysis of RC and steel structures.

Structural Analysis and Design to Eurocodes

Multifunctional research and sports center at 1 T. Daugirdo St., Kaunas, using LIRA-FEM and LIRA-CAD in accordance with the Eurocodes

1. Visualization of the research and sports center in Kaunas. 1 1. Visualization of the research and sports center in Kaunas. 2

1. Visualization of the research and sports center in Kaunas. 3

1. Visualization

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the capabilities of LIRA-FEM and LIRA-CAD for a complete cycle of structural analysis in accordance with the Eurocodes.

Project description:

Characteristics

-Consequence class by LST EN 1990:2004 – CC3.

-Reliability class by STR 2.05.03:2003 – RC2.

-Design working life by LST EN 1990:2004 – 50 years.

-Building type by use by STR 1.01.03:2017 – Non-residential building, subgroup (7.11) - buildings for research and educational purposes.

-Category by STR 1.01.03:2017 – special buildings.

-Type of construction by STR 1.01.08:2002 – new construction.

Main design solutions

The research and sports center has plan dimensions of 85 × 32.8 m. The building height is 13.75 m from the design elevation ±0.00. The floor level of the lowest storey is at elevation –3.9 m (relative to ±0.00).

The main load-bearing structures are cast-in-place reinforced concrete. The roof load-bearing structures are steel with timber rafters. The building is divided into two temperature zones and is constructed in three stages.

Interaction with adjacent buildings:
The building has no rigid structural connection to the existing buildings and is separated from them by retaining walls and an expansion joint.

Structural system

Cast-in-place reinforced concrete foundations on bored piles. The perimeter of the underground part is formed by pile walls. Cast-in-place reinforced concrete plinth beams; walls of staircases and elevator shafts; columns; floor slabs (beam-and-slab systems are used in zones with high loads). Pitched roofs are supported by steel trusses and timber rafters. Slabs are rigidly connected to columns and walls. Columns are cast-in-place reinforced concrete. Staircase walls and elevator shafts are flexibly connected to the foundations. Steel beams and trusses are hinged to reinforced concrete structures.

Stages of model generation

LIRA-CAD 

The model was fully developed in LIRA-CAD. All main load-bearing elements were modelled, with cross-sections, structural elements, material properties, boundary conditions and loads defined. Area loads were automatically converted into line loads applied to each rafter.

LIRA-FEM

Local model issues were refined in LIRA-FEM, and three different models were created for nonlinear analysis by ULS, SLS Characteristic and SLS Quasi-permanent. Nonlinear tension-only elements were also used to model braces that work only in tension

2. Physical and analytical model of the building in LIRA-CAD


2. Physical and analytical model of the building in LIRA-CAD.

Load application

Permanent loads (LC1–LC7)

  • LC1: self-weight of structures;
  • LC2: permanent load on floor slabs;
  • LC3: facade load;
  • LC4: soil pressure.
  • LC5: equipment load
  • LC6-LC7: load from the retractable grandstand (2 cases)

Imposed loads (LC9–LC12)

  • LC9: loads according to the intended use of the premises;
  • LC10: loads from internal partitions, equipment, etc..
  • LC11-LC12: load from the retractable grandstand (2 cases)

Climatic loads (LC13–LC18)

  • LC13-LC14: snow loads (2 cases + snow drifts);
  • LC15–LC18: wind loads in four directions (X+, X–, Y+, Y–).
3.1 Snow load
3.1 Snow
3.2 Wind load
3.2 Wind

                             

3.3 Occupancy load
                                                                                               

3.3 Occupancy load

Load combination tables were generated automatically. The safety factors for variable loads were changed from 1.5 to 1.3 in accordance with the Lithuanian National Annex to Eurocode LST EN 1991-1-1. The dynamic effects that may occur in the grandstand area were also taken into account



4. Analysis model in VISOR, Section B. 1

4. Analysis model in VISOR (Section B).
4. Analysis model in VISOR, Section B. 2


5. Analysis results: horizontal wall reinforcement. 1

5. Analysis results: horizontal wall reinforcement.

Analysis results: vertical wall reinforcement.

6. Analysis results: vertical wall reinforcement


6. Analysis results: vertical wall reinforcement.

7. Analysis results: required reinforcement in the X direction, top layer of the first-floor slab

7. Analysis results: Required reinforcement in the X direction, top layer of the first-floor slab.

8. Analysis results: required reinforcement in the Y direction, top layer of the first-floor slab


8. Analysis results: Required reinforcement in the Y direction, top layer of the first-floor slab.

9. Analysis results: required reinforcement in the X direction, bottom layer of the first-floor slab


9. Analysis results: Required reinforcement in the X direction, bottom layer of the first-floor slab.

10. Analysis results: required reinforcement in the Y direction, bottom layer of the first-floor slab


10. Analysis results: Required reinforcement in the Y direction, bottom layer of the first-floor slab.

11. Nonlinear analysis results: deflection considering physical nonlinearity and creep


11. Nonlinear analysis results: Deflection considering physical nonlinearity and creep.

12. Nonlinear analysis results: crack width for the SLS combination at the top face of the slab


12. Nonlinear analysis results: crack width for the SLS combination at the top face of the slab.

13. Nonlinear analysis results: crack width for the SLS combination at the bottom face of the slab


13. Nonlinear analysis results: crack width for the SLS combination at the bottom face of the slab.

14. Nonlinear analysis results: concrete stress for the ULS combination at the bottom face of the slab


14. Nonlinear analysis results: Concrete stress for the ULS combination at the bottom face of the slab.

15. Nonlinear analysis results: reinforcement stress for the ULS combination along the X-axis


15. Nonlinear analysis results: Reinforcement stress for the ULS combination along the X-axis.

16. Nonlinear analysis results: reinforcement stress for the ULS combination along the Y-axis. 1


16. Nonlinear analysis results: Reinforcement stress for the ULS combination along the Y-axis.

Analysis results: steel section utilization according to ULS

17. Analysis results: steel section utilization according to ULS. 1


17. Analysis results: Steel section utilization according to ULS

Analysis results: Steel section utilization according to SLS

18. Analysis results: steel section utilization according to SLS

18. Analysis results: Steel section utilization according to SLS

19. Nonlinear analysis results: forces in tension-only braces

19. Nonlinear analysis results: Forces in tension-only braces

Construction process

Construction process of the research and sports center in Kaunas

Comments

Write

Follow us

Other objects

Evaluate the software

If you have any doubt, download the Demo version and evaluate the program or contact our Support Team for more details.

Demo version or Request online presentation